I was a 3-time customer of Arnold Clark; unfortunately, I will never be one again. Should you have any major issues following purchase, please beware that their post-sales service is appalling. I lost hours of personal and work time in communication with them and travelling to and from branches, not to mention an undue amount of stress attempting to resolve the situation and in communications with an incompetent workforce. 8 days following purchase, I raised a fault with the vehicle to Arnold Clark. When given the opportunity to find the fault, the Salford branch advised me that the brake discs were pitted and needed replacing, and that this should have been noticed during the pre-sale preparation of the vehicle (a statement which head office have since contradicted). The brake discs were replaced under the post-purchase warranty; however, they were unable to replicate the fault the vehicle had been booked in for at this time. The fault recurred and the car was then booked in at the Bolton branch, which was the original purchase site. As I no longer felt safe with the vehicle due to the fault, coupled with what I had been advised regarding the brake discs, I employed my ‘Right to reject’ as per the Consumer Rights Act 2015. Whilst awaiting confirmation of the fault to proceed with rejection, I asked the branch manager, Dan Edwards to investigate why the car had been sold with the brake discs in bad condition (which I had previously requested of more junior staff) and requested the return of the wiring for the dashcam which I had had installed, Dan assured me he would come back to me on these points. Alas, he did not. I sent a follow-up email confirming my intention to reject and raised these points again. They were subsequently ignored, and Dan then became abrupt and ceased communications. I then wrote a formal complaint to Arnold Clark’s customer service department. I received a response to only one issue raised, with no actual explanation on this point and no response regarding the rest of my complaint, including the queries relating to the brake discs and wiring. Following this unsatisfactory response, I requested that my complaint be escalated to a senior manager. Almost a week later, I received a response from a manager, this time responding to multiple points raised, although still missing some. I was advised that my comments regarding the service received from staff would be investigated internally and that I would receive no feedback on this and that this was Arnold Clark’s final response. Arnold Clark clearly do not care about customer retention or customer satisfaction, if the points raised had been responded to accordingly in the first instance, I may have considered purchasing another car from them in the future, but I certainly will not now. It is also worth noting that Arnold Clark do not offer any courtesy vehicles suitable for those with limitations due to physical ailments or those with an automatic-only driving licence. In addition, I would encourage anyone looking to purchase a vehicle from Arnold Clark not to use their ADD500 part exchange promotion and to instead negotiate their part exchange value further. Should there be any reason to reject the vehicle, this value is non-refundable as per the T&Cs. No one expects to have to reject a vehicle; if I had any expectation of this, I would have negotiated myself as I would not have accepted the non-promotional value. I have now suffered substantial loss due to this experience, losing at least 12 hours of work, paying for the fuel of family and friends and for taxis, the cost of dashcam installation, the cost of changing vehicle insurance and tax for a vehicle I barely used (due to safety concerns and faults being looked into at branch), and the part exchange value, with no way to recoup this. Overall, I now have an extremely negative view of the Arnold Clark brand and the competence of their customer service department, a loyal customer lost