My experience as an NBI presenter has been a very good one. The NBI staff is very helpful and the seminars are always staged with the utmost professionalism. Over the years, there has been and continues to be only two things that, in my opinion, need to be corrected. (1) When a seminar is geared to the lawyers in a particular State, sometime the topics and subtopics cover laws and legal principles that have not been adopted by the State in which the seminar is being presented, and have no relevance to the attendees. (2) The seminar agenda often includes too many subtopics to cover in the time provided, leading the attending lawyers to complain that not everything was covered sufficiently. In my opinion, both of these flaws could easily be corrected if the NBI coordinator would consult with the presenting lawyer before finalizing the seminar agenda. If NBI believes that its presenters are experts in their topics, then the seminar coordinator should consider that the presenter knows best which subtopics should be presented in order to cover the most relevant issues of a topic.