“I think it has been a good training but it can be improved if teacher tries to get interaction/feedback/participation with the members of the course.”
“It was Great because of the extraordinary Trainer Ken Goff that we had he transmitted the material in a way to understand it easily I enjoyed the course a lot one of the best courses I attended so far.
Big thanks to Ken”
“Thought the course was good and the instructor was excellent, felt like there was almost too much to fit into the 3 days though and kind of rushed to complete the labs, also some of the labs didn't work properly due to missing or incorrect information.”
“Course content and exercises were excellent.
The trainer (Thamim Karim) seemed to know everything you could know about App-V and his presentation skills were first class.”
“Provided a nice overview on the topic with Q&A session after each section to check the understanding of subject along with some business case to apply the knowledge of the learning. It was an interactive session with involvement from everybody from the session.”
“Fast Track to Red Hat Linux 7 System Administrator
Attended the course in March 2016 organised by StayAhead through Global Knowledge.
This is a pre-requisite for Red Hat Linux 7 System Admin 3.
I then attended Red Hat Linux 7 System Admin 3 ran by Red Hat.
I am somewhat amazed to see the technical differences between the two courses, not in terms of the topics, but on the quality, technical expertise, and the equipment provided.
To be fair, StayAhead charges quite substantially (x00 Pounds) less....”
“This review relates to TOGAF level 1 & 2 course.
I was initially sent to wrong location - others on course were provided with an updated venue the week prior to course start. When I arrived at the wrong location, they knew I hadn't been sent an email.
Much of the content on the course was incorrect with the course instructor having to explain why what he was teaching was different to content.
No physical content was provided - having to rely on inaccurate online slides and .pdf files (note: these are no good when you are trying to make annotations or apply quick bookmarks for future revision).
The only saving grace of this course was the instructor, he was very knowledgeable about the subject and was able to impart information in a clear, concise manner.
I won't be booking another GK course if there is no physical instruction content provided.”
“overall, the course was good and provided me with important knowledge. I felt it was a little too much for 5 days and that 6 days would be more fitting for the amount of material. there was not enough time for labs as well because of this. another annoying issue is that the lab environment gets closed when the course ends, it would be great to have it open for a few more weeks for self-study.
the instructor was good and patient, I felt there were a few topics that didn't get enough attention during the course but as I mentioned, time was an issue.
Thank you!”
“Shinman Gilad is an excellent mentor, with great presentation skills. Is clearly seen that he has and excellent understanding if the material. He has the rare ability to make the material approachable even for students without the technical background.”
“Would have given top marks for the trainer who was excellent but it felt to me as if it should have been a five day course. The work material had several mistakes including a complete set of slides which were copied from an earlier example and not updated. The training facilities were not quite up to scratch either. The screen was too small and so we followed the slides on our laptops and handheld devices which kind of worked but because these were delivered as a pdf the resolution was bad on a lot of the images. It also made scrolling backwards and forwards difficult. Overall, it was a good course and the online pack is a useful resource.”
