“The "VMware 6.0 What's new" was a good course, but unfortunately we are on VSphere 5.0 Enterprise currently and the main discussion assumes that the users are on VSphere 5.5 and using the Enterprise Plus features of 5.5. It still gave me a good idea. I possibly should have gone for the 5 day install and configure.
The disappointing thing was that no course notes were provided. Course notes are online. I like to make notes in the books within the chapters as we go along not a separate piece of paper.
As there were only 5 people on the course the classroom had about 15-20 seats. So all students were spread around and unfortunately I needed to be close to front.”
“The tutor Les was very friendly and did his best to make the topic (ITIL foundation) accessible. The only thing that surprised me what the exam was paper based.”
“The ScrumMaster training was well-run, informative and useful. The instructor's experience was definitely a value-add to the course. Interaction among participants was key to understanding Scrum from all angles.
Points of improvement would be to improve pacing and to provide more feedback on the tasks in the workshop. The first day went a lot slower then the second - perhaps this could be distributed better to load both days more equally? And feedback on the 'Sprints' in the workshop could be more objective and detailed.
Overall it was a good workshop and I would recommend it to colleagues.”
“The trainer, Duncan I think his name unfortunately could not deliver. He was not really teaching but rather talking. The trainer wouldn't go over what he has taught and wouldn't ask the class anything either. What I found really astonishing and dreadful was that not once in the whole 3 days did he ask any of us if we have any questions. I had to ask him and even raise my hand to get his attention.
Moreover the method and style he taught was carried out in such a manner which deemed most of us to fail and so that was the case as out of the 16/17 people being taught only a handful passed and the remaining failed. Duncan's style of teaching was nothing less than awful and a failure to Global Knowledge. Duncan did not do Global Knowledge any justice by teaching in such a way. I really hope this feedback is taken on board and his teaching method is reviewed.”
“The sample questions are very helpful exercises to prepare for the exam. I found that the sample questions were all much easier to reply than the real exam. It would be much better when sample questions with the same level of difficulty could be used in the training to get prepared.”
“I attended a virtual session with Ian Wilkes. I was fortunate that this ended up being a 1 to 1 session and was impressed with Ian's ability to conduct the course and backup the material with personal experiences and issues on the subject and convey that into an understanding that will greatly benefit my future involvement with TSM.
Thank you.”
“The accommodation for the training was fine, no issues with the equipment etc.
The trainer did not seem to be 100% up to speed with the course, it seemed like he hadn't done the SharePoint 2013 Core Development course in a while or had not prepared, he had some problems explaining certain things clearly and getting the demos to work. This made it harder to understand what he was trying to explain as often we could not see examples working in a real world scenario. The course was too reliant on typing code in fast and seeing the outcome rather than going through the content slower and understanding what we were trying to produce.”
“The Selling Business Outcomes course is part of my on-boarding with my current organisation. The course is very informative and provides you with a good overview of outcome focused selling. Overall I enjoyed the course, the proof will be when I pass the exam. My only criticism is that we deviated off the general course as I had studied previously on the Cisco website so have had to spend time assessing which part went with which for my revision.”
“The course appeared to be aimed at folk with very little presentation experience. It was not tailored to my organization.
The highlight was the ability to watch a video of oneself and critically analyse ones presentation style. This concept was very good, but the execution was poor because each presentation was presented, then the video reviewed, then the same material was used in the virtual presentation. This repetition was very boring.”
“Everything was ok. I enjoyed the course, learned a lot, and I will recommend you further.
It would be very good, if the examples were less complicated. We spend, in some of the example, more time to understand the example itself, rather than understanding and working with the main subject.
Best regards
Firas Uthmani”
“Very good, open the eyes on things and subjects that we are not aware of, the interaction with the trainer was very good, he understood our concerns and alwasy was abel to provide a good feedback.
The material was also good, it was align with what we do as Three, how do we operate.
Overall excelent.”
“Georges is a very good trainer, It can not be easy for someone to lead a virtual training the way he does, with pretty much the equivalent as no audience as it seems that visibility is one direction only with adobe connect. It may be good thinking about having a software where George can also see the face of the ones in the training, and have some visual interaction. But this is the second training with Georges this same way, and both times, Georges was able to keep the audience still interested and the training was clear to understand.
The content was to the point and easy to follow. Thank you,”
“The training course took place in a small classroom and we were a reduced group consisting of only four people, which I think it's ideal.
Our teacher demonstrated a truly in-depth knowledge of all the topics and he often encouraged participation from the attendants.
My only complaint is that the labs may have been too straightforward, with excessively detailed instructions in every single step of the way. I'd rather have the opportunity of struggling a bit and even making some mistakes so I can learn from whatever I have done wrong.”
“The quality of the course I attended(Architecting for AWS) was very high but the details for how to get to the course and what to take with me where not. Several calls to Global Knowledge were required on the first morning just to get to the correct location as it was being held at a vendor site. Also attendees had to supply their own workstation devices. Not the best start to the course.”
“A good course to if you need to quickly gain an understanding of the SharePoint core features.
The instructor had great knowledge and did well to cover the amount of content in the short time we had, however the pace could have perhaps been a little quicker.
Would recommend, one of the best MS courses I have taken.”
